<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why do people believe there was a surplus during Clinton Years?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefinancialblurbosphere.com/why-do-people-believe-there-was-a-surplus-during-clinton-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefinancialblurbosphere.com/why-do-people-believe-there-was-a-surplus-during-clinton-years/</link>
	<description>For all things financial</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:38:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Soundless</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblurbosphere.com/why-do-people-believe-there-was-a-surplus-during-clinton-years/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Soundless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 01:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefinancialblurbosphere.com/why-do-people-believe-there-was-a-surplus-during-clinton-years/#comment-257</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


Okay, read this very slowly since you apparently have a problem comprehending what you read and hear.

Read the history of the Clinton years. Stop listening to Republican propaganda. They speak you parrot. They say &quot;shit&quot; you squat and start straining. What is wrong with that picture?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""></a></p>
<p>Okay, read this very slowly since you apparently have a problem comprehending what you read and hear.</p>
<p>Read the history of the Clinton years. Stop listening to Republican propaganda. They speak you parrot. They say &#8220;shit&#8221; you squat and start straining. What is wrong with that picture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peaco1000</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblurbosphere.com/why-do-people-believe-there-was-a-surplus-during-clinton-years/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>peaco1000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefinancialblurbosphere.com/why-do-people-believe-there-was-a-surplus-during-clinton-years/#comment-256</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


Who handled the economy better Clinton or Bush? Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""></a></p>
<p>Who handled the economy better Clinton or Bush? Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dem2008</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblurbosphere.com/why-do-people-believe-there-was-a-surplus-during-clinton-years/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Dem2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefinancialblurbosphere.com/why-do-people-believe-there-was-a-surplus-during-clinton-years/#comment-255</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


You&#039;re speaking in blacks and whites, still, though. Under Clinton, his first few years saw deficits, but in his last few, we had surpluses, especially around 2000. But as soon as Bush took office, our deficit increased heavily, and it&#039;s definitely safe to say that the deficit under Clinton was MUCH less than the deficit under Bush. MUCH more significant problem. Both parties can be &quot;budget busters,&quot; but the numbers still say that Clinton&#039;s administration consisted of more responsible fiscal spenders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""></a></p>
<p>You&#8217;re speaking in blacks and whites, still, though. Under Clinton, his first few years saw deficits, but in his last few, we had surpluses, especially around 2000. But as soon as Bush took office, our deficit increased heavily, and it&#8217;s definitely safe to say that the deficit under Clinton was MUCH less than the deficit under Bush. MUCH more significant problem. Both parties can be &#8220;budget busters,&#8221; but the numbers still say that Clinton&#8217;s administration consisted of more responsible fiscal spenders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howdigethere</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblurbosphere.com/why-do-people-believe-there-was-a-surplus-during-clinton-years/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>howdigethere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefinancialblurbosphere.com/why-do-people-believe-there-was-a-surplus-during-clinton-years/#comment-254</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


Exactly. It is just another &#039;fact&#039; media has convinced people is a fact. We put way too much faith in media for information and assume that if it is in print, it must be true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""></a></p>
<p>Exactly. It is just another &#8216;fact&#8217; media has convinced people is a fact. We put way too much faith in media for information and assume that if it is in print, it must be true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANTI-SOCIALIST</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblurbosphere.com/why-do-people-believe-there-was-a-surplus-during-clinton-years/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>ANTI-SOCIALIST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefinancialblurbosphere.com/why-do-people-believe-there-was-a-surplus-during-clinton-years/#comment-253</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


No argument here. There was a surplus in fiscal budget but nothing to pay of the sustained debt.
Personally, I have no problem -w- debt. As a percentage of GDP it is manageable. They say it&#039;s mortgaging our childrens future. We&#039;ll, has not stopped people everywhere from mortgages. Are mortgages bad if you live in improved conditions while you pay for them. Or should you let things go to hell and let them deal with it as they are able.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""></a></p>
<p>No argument here. There was a surplus in fiscal budget but nothing to pay of the sustained debt.<br />
Personally, I have no problem -w- debt. As a percentage of GDP it is manageable. They say it&#8217;s mortgaging our childrens future. We&#8217;ll, has not stopped people everywhere from mortgages. Are mortgages bad if you live in improved conditions while you pay for them. Or should you let things go to hell and let them deal with it as they are able.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblurbosphere.com/why-do-people-believe-there-was-a-surplus-during-clinton-years/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefinancialblurbosphere.com/why-do-people-believe-there-was-a-surplus-during-clinton-years/#comment-252</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


people believe there was a surplus, because the talking heads of the democratic party kept repeating it.

they lie through their teeth.

This is proven very easy! the Federal Reserve Act passed by the progressive liberals.

turned over our .money system to the ferderal reserve system, which is 13 private banking cartel. which is treason against the American people by their government.

in the federal reserve act, the american people can never pay off the princple of the debt only the interest and it has to be paid in gold not dollars!

all you have to do is read their laws!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""></a></p>
<p>people believe there was a surplus, because the talking heads of the democratic party kept repeating it.</p>
<p>they lie through their teeth.</p>
<p>This is proven very easy! the Federal Reserve Act passed by the progressive liberals.</p>
<p>turned over our .money system to the ferderal reserve system, which is 13 private banking cartel. which is treason against the American people by their government.</p>
<p>in the federal reserve act, the american people can never pay off the princple of the debt only the interest and it has to be paid in gold not dollars!</p>
<p>all you have to do is read their laws!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slyham166</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblurbosphere.com/why-do-people-believe-there-was-a-surplus-during-clinton-years/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>slyham166</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefinancialblurbosphere.com/why-do-people-believe-there-was-a-surplus-during-clinton-years/#comment-251</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


If the Clinton&#039;s did leave with a surplus,Clinton&#039;s didn&#039;t help Gore win seat to continue the job!NAFTA was in place by Clinton&#039;s and gave away jobs and business to foreign countries!Clinton&#039;s also made 110 million dollars after leaving office! How? Very mysterious situation!
Obama 2008!
Ebony &amp; Ivory President!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""></a></p>
<p>If the Clinton&#8217;s did leave with a surplus,Clinton&#8217;s didn&#8217;t help Gore win seat to continue the job!NAFTA was in place by Clinton&#8217;s and gave away jobs and business to foreign countries!Clinton&#8217;s also made 110 million dollars after leaving office! How? Very mysterious situation!<br />
Obama 2008!<br />
Ebony &#038; Ivory President!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

