October 15, 2010
Understanding How Legal Pardons Work In The United States
When one considers forgiveness, often it is in relation to someone who has committed a crime. However, in some cases, there may be enough evidence or other reasoning to forgive the crime, or at the very least, commute the sentence of an individual who committed such an act. As such, at times individuals can obtain legal pardons, have a sentenced commuted, or acquire clemency. Of course, while clemency encompasses all acts in relation to commuting a sentence, forgiveness and a pardon, often clemency is provided in relation to foreign criminals more often than local ones.
However, while a pardon may portray a sense of forgiveness, often accepting such a pardon is admission of guilt. As such, often one can never have such crimes removed from record. So, before accepting such a pardon, one may want to accept that one may still never be able to vote or run for public office.
Of course, while one could go through Federal channels to attempt to have Civil Rights restored, one can often do so more quickly through State channels. As such, if running for public office or voting is of great importance, one may want to go through the State court system when requesting such rights be restored.
However, often the crime may contribute to the possibility of having such rights restored. For, while those who are clearly guilty may be less likely to have such rights restored, with new DNA evidence, those proven to have been wrongfully convicted are more likely to receive such pardons. Although, while the latter may be a good sign, the number of pardons overall are far less than those received prior to World War II.
However, another area in which pardons are associated is that of clemency. Often, such clemency is granted by a foreign State in relation to a citizen who has been convicted of a crime and sentenced to capital punishment. Of course, more often than not, such requests for clemency come from countries in which such capital punishment is not practiced. As such, in many case such punishment goes against International law and as a result, clemency is then granted.
Of course, there are both good pardons and ones perceived not to be so good. Such as the case with Leonard Peltier and Richard Nixon. For, while Mr. Peltier has requested a pardon over and over again, one has yet to be granted. Whereas, before Nixon had even been convicted of a crime did he receive a pardon from President Ford.
For, while this may be one reason such powers are only granted to the President when it comes to Federal crimes, the Supreme Court has added their own interpretation of such law. As an example, the Supreme Court has not only granted and limited such power in relation to full pardons, but to remission of fees, respites, forfeitures, conditional pardons and both full and partial sentence commutations thus giving the president full power in such regard.
So, regardless of the reason for requesting such a pardon, one must address such request to the President of the United States, who can then grant or deny such request. Of course, while there have been fewer pardons since World War II than before, this is most likely because fewer individuals have provided good enough reasons for such pardons. As such, most individuals still believe it is good that Alexander Hamilton defended such powers when requesting a pardon in relation to the Whiskey Rebellion.
For, although the United States Justice Dept. May recommend that individuals requesting a pardon must do so within a certain time frame either after conviction, or before one is to be released, individuals found to have been wrongfully convicted may not have to wait as long. Still, as a presidential pardon can be granted at any time during a sentence, if one has a good enough reason, one may be able to obtain such a pardon. Although, such pardons must generally be requested by prison officials or Heads of State in order to be acknowledged, read and processed.
Therefore, whether individuals receive a legal pardon for political reasons, or obtains an early release, often one must still report the incident on all forms which require such information. However, provided one has good reasons for such a pardon or having a sentence commuted, one may be able to have Civil Rights restored at some point through a Federal or State court.
Pardons in law is an exemption from punishment for a criminal conviction granted by the grace of the executive of a government. Let Canadian Pardons remove your criminal record.
Filed under Law & Ethics by
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to comment